Looking for a Modjo alternative? You're not alone. Revenue teams are switching to more modern, flexible conversation intelligence platforms that offer better AI automation, transparent pricing, and features built for today's sales workflows.
There are two main families of Modjo alternatives:
- Revenue Intelligence platforms - Full conversation intelligence with deal insights, forecasting, and coaching (closest to Modjo)
- AI Meeting Assistants - Lighter tools focused on recording, notes, and basic analytics at lower price points
If you want the closest "Modjo but better" experience for European teams, look at Claap first. For enterprise-scale revenue operations, Gong leads the market. For budget-conscious teams wanting solid AI notes, consider tl;dv or Fathom.
Quick Answer: Top Modjo Competitors at a Glance
Why are Revenue Teams leaving Modjo?
Modjo remains a solid conversation intelligence platform, but teams are exploring alternatives for several reasons:
Cost vs. Value - Modjo's pricing can be steep for mid-sized teams, especially when compared to newer platforms offering similar features at more competitive rates. Many teams find themselves paying for capabilities they don't fully use.
Feature Innovation - Teams want faster AI automation - from instant CRM updates to automated follow-up emails. Modern platforms are shipping AI-powered workflows that reduce post-call admin work more aggressively than traditional CI tools.
Flexibility and Collaboration - The shift to hybrid work means teams need more than just call storage and analysis. They want async video, better clip sharing, and collaboration features that work across sales, product, and marketing teams.
These gaps have opened the door for alternatives that combine conversation intelligence with modern workflows, transparent pricing, and features designed for how revenue teams actually work in 2025.
1. Claap – The Best "Modjo but Modern" Alternative
Positioning vs Modjo
Claap is your AI-powered Sales Call & Pipeline Assistant built specifically for revenue teams. It automatically records and analyzes sales meetings, updates your CRM, and surfaces deal insights—all while helping reps save over 6 hours per week on post-meeting tasks.
What makes Claap stand out is how it combines Modjo's core conversation intelligence capabilities with modern async video collaboration (think Loom meets revenue intelligence). You get sales-focused AI, deal insights, and coaching features—plus the ability to share knowledge asynchronously across your entire go-to-market organization.
Key features
- Automatic Meeting Recording & Transcription: Captures meetings on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams with accurate transcriptions in 99+ languages, so no detail is ever missed.
- AI-Powered Notes & Follow-ups: Generate custom meeting recaps and action items using your own templates. Create personalized follow-up emails with one click that perfectly mirror your communication style.
- CRM Auto-Fill & Enrichment: Keeps your CRM automatically updated after every call based on your discussions. Fields are filled, deals are enriched, and your data stays clean—without lifting a finger.
- Deal & Pipeline Insights: The AI Analyst dives into your deals, providing actionable insights on why deals are won or lost. Smart Tables let you analyze dozens of calls to assess qualification, objection handling, top feature requests, and how prospects compare you to competitors.
- Sales Coaching at Scale: Track how well reps execute MEDDIC, BANT, SPIN, or build custom frameworks that reflect your actual sales process. Each rep gets AI-powered feedback including talk ratios and post-call guidance. Managers can review dozens of calls at a glance and prepare coaching sessions easily.
- Collaborative Video Workspace: Team members can annotate, comment, and discuss specific moments directly on the video timeline. All recordings are organized into channels—a true video wiki for your team.
Strengths
- Built for revenue teams, not generic note-taking: Deal insights, coaching workflows, and objection tracking are native to the platform. Save 30 minutes per meeting with automated summaries and CRM updates.
- EU-friendly and GDPR-compliant: European company with strong focus on data privacy and language coverage—critical for Modjo's typical customer base.
- Transparent, mid-market pricing with a genuine free tier and no hidden platform fees. What you see is what you pay.
- User sentiment: G2 rating of 4.8/5 with 130+ reviews. Users praise easy async video, clear call summaries, and reduced meeting load. Chrome extension rated 4.9/5, with users highlighting fast summarization and CRM workflows.
- Proven results:
- Surfe shortened their sales cycle by 10 days
- TenderApp improved win rates by 66% (SQL-to-win rate jumped from 9% to 15%)
- Ronspot boosted demo conversion rates by 33% and deal value by 26%
Weaknesses
- Some users mention slow processing on longer videos and occasional UI navigation challenges where certain options feel hidden.
Pricing
- Basic: Free – 10 videos + 300 minutes of recording per user
- Pro: $32/user/month ($40 monthly) – Unlimited videos, storage, and 1,000 minutes per month
- Business: $60/user/month ($75 monthly) – Full AI notes, CRM enrichment, deal insights, and coaching
- Enterprise: Custom – Contact Claap for tailored enterprise features
Best for
European SMB and mid-market revenue teams that want Modjo-style conversation intelligence with async video collaboration and transparent pricing—without Gong-level complexity or platform fees.
The "Revenue Intelligence" Heavyweights (Enterprise)
These are direct Modjo replacements for teams that need deep deal forecasting, robust analytics, and have larger budgets.
2. Gong – Deepest Enterprise Revenue Intelligence (But Very Pricey)
Positioning vs Modjo
Gong is the market-leading revenue intelligence OS, going far beyond Modjo in depth. It combines conversation intelligence, deal intelligence, and people intelligence into a single platform used by 4,500+ companies. It's overkill for many SMBs, but the benchmark at enterprise level.
Key features
- Conversation Intelligence: Automatic recording and transcription with smart trackers for topics, competitors, pricing, sentiment, and talk-ratio analytics
- Deal Intelligence: Pipeline views with engagement scores, deal risk signals, opportunity health, and forecast support based on activity patterns
- People Intelligence: Rep-level performance and coaching insights, identification of top-performer behaviors for enablement
- Revenue AI OS: Gong Revenue Graph + AI agents for workflows across CRM and GTM tools
Strengths
- Extremely rich analytics across calls, emails, and deals; widely seen as the enterprise standard
- G2: 4.8/5 from 6,400+ reviews, with users praising coaching capabilities and deal visibility
- Strong ecosystem of integrations and mature implementation playbook
Weaknesses
- Gong Pricing and complexity are main complaints:
- 2025 pricing shows Foundation core at ≈$108-120/user/month, bundled packages (Core + Engage + Forecast) at ≈$240-250/user/month
- Mandatory platform fees from $5k-$50k and implementation fees $15k-$65k can double first-year cost
- Common 3-year contracts with 5-15% renewal uplifts
- Reviews highlight difficult call search, AI trackers requiring manual tuning, and declining support quality in some implementations
Pricing
Quote-based only, but buyer data points to:
- ≈$108-120/user/month for core Foundation
- ≈$240-250/user/month when Engage & Forecast included
- Plus platform + implementation fees
Best for
Large, process-mature sales organizations that can invest six figures+ per year, need full revenue OS capabilities, and have RevOps resources to drive adoption.
3. Chorus by ZoomInfo – Best if You're Already a ZoomInfo Customer
Positioning vs Modjo
Chorus is a conversation intelligence platform acquired by ZoomInfo and deeply integrated with its B2B data graph. Functionally it overlaps with Modjo, but its real power appears when you already pay for ZoomInfo.
Key features
- Call and meeting recording, transcription, and search across calls, emails, and meetings
- ZoomInfo integration: Automatic contact enrichment, buying committee and stakeholder mapping, intent and research behavior overlays
- Sales coaching & enablement: Snippets and call libraries for onboarding, scorecards and coaching workflows
- Deal and forecasting support via synced communications and contact data
Strengths
- Deep data synergy with ZoomInfo—powerful when you already use it for prospecting
- Users like its impact on onboarding and coaching, with ability to listen to top calls and share snippets
- G2 shows thousands of reviews with positive sentiment around insights and team ramp-up
Weaknesses
- Pricing structure is opaque and dependent on ZoomInfo:
- Flat fee ≈$8,000/year including 3 seats, plus $1,200/additional seat/year
- Maps to roughly $105-137/user/month depending on seat count
- You also need a ZoomInfo subscription, so total cost is significantly higher
- Users note Zoom integration quirks, missed recordings, and somewhat dated interface
- No self-serve free trial; requires sales engagement
Pricing
Flat fee ≈$8,000/year for 3 seats, then $1,200/additional seat/year—plus required ZoomInfo subscription.
Best for
Mid-market and enterprise teams already depending on ZoomInfo who want CI tightly coupled with that data, and can handle bundled, less transparent pricing.
4. Avoma – Balanced Conversation & Revenue Intelligence
Positioning vs Modjo
Avoma started as a meeting assistant and has grown into an all-in-one platform combining AI meeting notes, conversation intelligence, revenue intelligence, and scheduling/lead routing. Often recommended as a more accessible alternative to Gong/Modjo for mid-market teams.
Key features
- AI Meeting Assistant: Auto-recording and transcription, AI-generated notes and follow-up emails, calendar automation and dialer integration
- Conversation Intelligence: Smart trackers for topics, competitors, objections; talk-ratio, sentiment, engagement metrics; AI coaching scorecards
- Revenue Intelligence: Automated CRM field updates for MEDDIC/BANT/SPICED, deal risk analysis, churn signals, pipeline health, win/loss analysis
- Scheduling and lead routing as native modules
Strengths
- Broader scope than Modjo: combines CI + RI + scheduling, so teams can centralize more workflows
- Simpler, more transparent pricing than Gong/Chorus, with no separate platform fee; viewer seats are free
- Reviews praise tight HubSpot and CRM integrations, time saved in note-taking, strong support and onboarding
Weaknesses
- Some analyses argue Avoma's CI uses more keyword-based logic, making it less context-aware than newer "agentic" platforms
- Users mention occasional delays in notes appearing in CRM and some complexity in setup for advanced templates
- Some reviewers find it pricey for small teams and note that contracts can lead to paying for more seats than used
- Startup / AI Meeting Assistant: ≈$19-29/recorder seat/month
- Organization / Conversation Intelligence: typically $29-39/seat/month (some sources: CI module at $59/user/month)
- Revenue Intelligence: ≈$79/user/month for full RI features
- Enterprise: $39/seat/month+ with minimum seat counts and advanced access controls
Best for
Teams that want more than a notetaker but don't want Gong's cost or complexity—especially SaaS SMB and mid-market sales orgs already invested in HubSpot or similar CRMs.
The "Agile" AI Meeting Assistants (Lightweight)
Lower-cost alternatives for teams that just want recording, notes, and basic analytics without heavy pipeline features.
5. tl;dv – Generous Free Plan and Strong Sales Coaching Features
Positioning vs Modjo
tl;dv is an AI meeting assistant with surprisingly strong sales-oriented features (speech analytics, topic trackers, CRM sync, coaching) while keeping a very generous free tier. It's less of a full revenue platform than Modjo, but very attractive for cost-sensitive teams.
Key features
- Unlimited recording and transcription on the free plan for Zoom/Meet/Teams, with 30+ languages supported
- AI notes and summaries with templates and "Ask tl;dv" queries across past meetings
- Sales-oriented analytics: Speech analytics, talk-time, interruptions; topic trackers (pricing, objections, competitors); question detection
- Clipping and reels: Highlight segments, build reels, push timestamps into Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, Google Docs, etc.
Strengths
- Best-in-class free tier: unlimited recordings and transcripts with AI moment summaries, timestamps, and integrations
- Strong sales-team scenario coverage including coaching workflows
- Reviews highlight high-quality recordings, intuitive interface, easy setup, searchable transcripts
Weaknesses
- Reviews mention transcription issues on multilingual calls and weaker accuracy when multiple languages are mixed
- Some users report AI struggles with complex or highly technical discussions, requiring manual edits
- Free plan reliability: reports of the bot not always joining meetings reliably on free tier
- Free forever: Unlimited meetings, transcripts, AI moment summaries, basic integrations
- Pro: ≈$18/user/month – Unlimited notes, transcript search, improved AI features, CRM/Zapier integrations
- Business: ≈$59/user/month – More advanced coaching tools and analytics for larger teams
- Enterprise: Custom plans with security and advanced controls
Best for
Startups, product and CS teams, and sales teams who want strong AI notes and coaching on a generous free plan, and are okay with adding revenue intelligence from another tool later.
6. Fathom – Simple, Accurate AI Notetaker with Sales-Friendly Plans
Positioning vs Modjo
Fathom is an AI meeting assistant built around accurate, structured summaries and sales workflows, but without full-blown revenue intelligence. Often positioned as more accurate and polished than generic notetakers.
Key features
- Auto-join bot for Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams, with high-quality recording and transcription
- AI summaries with customizable templates (topics, decisions, action items), delivered minutes after each call
- Highlights, tagging, and clips for sharing important moments
- Integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Close, Slack, Asana, etc., especially at Team/Business tiers
- Multi-language support (Spanish, French, German, and more)
Strengths
- Reviewers frequently call Fathom "more accurate than other AI notetakers"
- G2 milestone: 5,000+ reviews, indicating huge adoption
- HubSpot marketplace reviews highlight massive time savings, good alignment with sales workflows, very low friction in onboarding
Weaknesses
- Free plan is heavily limited: unlimited recordings but only 5 AI summaries/month, pushing users quickly into paid tiers
- Users report recording glitches with multiple speakers or strong accents, Fathom interfering with Zoom UI in some setups
- Some advanced sales features (deal view, coaching metrics) are locked behind higher-priced plans
- Free: Unlimited recordings, but only 5 AI summaries/month and limited integrations
- Premium: $19/user/month (≈$15 annually) – Unlimited AI summaries, expanded integrations
- Team: ≈$29/user/month – Unlimited CRM sync, team-wide features, shared libraries, comments, keyword alerts
- Business / Team Pro: $39/user/month – Deal View, coaching metrics, advanced security, SSO, retention policies
Best for
Teams wanting a user-friendly, accurate AI assistant for sales and client calls, with good CRM sync, but not needing full multi-touch revenue intelligence.
7. Fireflies.ai – Analytics-Heavy AI Notetaker with Conversation Intelligence
Positioning vs Modjo
Fireflies started as an AI notetaker but has evolved into a meeting insights and conversation intelligence platform, with strong analytics (talk ratios, filler words, sentiment, topic tracking) and a very wide integration ecosystem. More CI-style analytics than Otter/Fathom, but less full-fledged deal intelligence than Modjo/Gong.
Key features
- Fred, the bot, auto-joins Zoom/Meet/Teams/Webex calls and records/transcribes in 100+ languages
- Real-time and post-meeting transcripts; searchable archive, clips, and comments
- Conversation Intelligence suite: Talk-to-listen ratio, filler words, monologues, silence duration, sentiment analysis, topic insights from tracked keywords
- Integrates with 200+ tools, including Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Asana, project tools, etc.
Strengths
- Strong analytics for coaching and sales enablement: talk ratios, sentiment, and topic trends help managers understand rep performance
- Third-party reviews note high transcription accuracy on clear audio and robust real-time transcripts
- Trustpilot: 4.5/5 with ~488 reviews, with users praising accuracy, time saved, and multi-language robustness
- Very broad integrations; good choice for teams needing to connect CI with a large SaaS stack
Weaknesses
- Bot intrusiveness: Multiple users complain that Fred joins too many meetings automatically and can feel invasive
- Long meetings can have 10-15 minute processing delays for transcripts and summaries
- Many advanced AI features and analytics are locked behind Business/Enterprise and/or AI credit systems, making total cost less predictable
- Free: 800 minutes storage, limited transcription, no advanced integrations
- Pro: ≈$10-18/user/month – Unlimited transcription for hosted meetings, AI summaries, basic analytics
- Business: ≈$19-29/user/month – Shared workspaces, CRM integrations, richer analytics and API access
- Enterprise: ≈$39/user/month – Compliance features (HIPAA), admin controls, dedicated support; AI add-ons extra
Best for
Teams with high meeting volume who care deeply about conversation analytics (talk ratios, sentiment, topics) and want rich integrations, but do not need a full revenue OS like Gong.
8. Otter.ai – Mainstream Notetaker with Limited Revenue Focus
Positioning vs Modjo
Otter is one of the most widely known AI meeting note-takers, primarily optimized for real-time transcription and summaries, not specifically for revenue intelligence. It can be a light Modjo alternative if your focus is "stop taking manual notes" rather than sales analytics.
Key features
- Otter Notetaker bot auto-joins Zoom/Meet/Teams meetings via calendar integration and transcribes in real time
- Live transcript visible to meeting participants with highlights, comments, and collaborative notes
- Automatic meeting summaries and action items, plus AI chat to query past meetings
- Channels and shared workspaces to organize transcripts and notes
Strengths
- Very easy to use and widely adopted; users praise its intuitive interface and fast setup
- Strong real-time transcription and decent accuracy in good audio conditions
- Suitable across many roles (students, journalists, internal meetings), not just sales
Weaknesses
- Not focused on revenue intelligence: Limited analytics compared with Modjo/Gong/Claap; mostly just transcripts, summaries, and basic collaboration
- Reviews frequently highlight accuracy drops with accents, technical terms, or noisy audio; poor speaker recognition
- Billing and cancellation complaints, plus frustration with plan changes and perceived value of paid tiers
- For large teams, Business/Enterprise pricing becomes less competitive against more sales-oriented tools
- Basic (Free): 300 minutes/month, 30 minutes per conversation, limited imports
- Pro: $8.33/user/month (annual billing) – 1,200 minutes/month, 90-minute meeting cap, 10 file imports
- Business: $20/user/month (annual) – 6,000 minutes/month, 4-hour cap, more team features
- Enterprise: Custom; substantial annual deals for large deployments
Best for
Teams that mainly want reliable transcription plus simple summaries across many meeting types, and are less focused on sales-specific coaching or revenue analytics.
How to Choose the Right Alternative
Here's a simple framework to guide your decision:
Choose Claap if:
- You're an EU/Global team wanting Modjo features + async video at transparent pricing
- You need conversation intelligence, deal insights, and coaching without enterprise complexity
- You want to save 30 min per call with automated notes and CRM updates
- GDPR compliance matters to your organization
Choose Gong if:
- You're an Enterprise (500+ reps) needing deep forecast analytics
- You have six-figure+ budget and dedicated RevOps resources
- You need the most comprehensive revenue intelligence OS on the market
Choose Avoma if:
- You want CI/RI plus scheduling and lead routing in one platform
- You're a mid-market team looking for simpler pricing than Gong
- HubSpot is central to your sales stack
Choose tl;dv, Fathom, or Fireflies if:
- You just want automated notes and have a limited budget
- You're okay with lighter revenue intelligence features
- You need a generous free tier to get started (tl;dv) or prioritize accuracy (Fathom) or deep analytics (Fireflies)
FAQs
What is the best free alternative to Modjo?
tl;dv offers the most generous free plan among Modjo alternatives, with unlimited recordings, transcripts, and AI moment summaries. Fathom also has a free tier but limits you to 5 AI summaries per month. If you need robust conversation intelligence features on a free plan, tl;dv is your best bet—though you'll eventually want to upgrade for advanced coaching and CRM integration features.
Which tool is best for European Sales teams?
Claap stands out for European teams because it's built by a European company with strong GDPR compliance, supports 99+ languages for accurate transcription, and offers transparent pricing in euros. It combines conversation intelligence with async video collaboration, making it ideal for distributed teams across Europe. Unlike American-centric platforms, Claap understands European data privacy requirements and business practices.
How much does Gong cost vs Modjo?
Gong typically costs $108-250/user/month depending on which modules you bundle (Foundation, Engage, Forecast), plus mandatory platform fees of $5k-$50k and implementation fees of $15k-$65k. Modjo's pricing is similarly opaque and requires custom quotes. For more transparent pricing, consider Claap ($32-60/user/month) or Avoma ($19-79/user/month) which offer similar conversation intelligence features without hidden platform fees.
Do these tools integrate with Salesforce & HubSpot?
Yes, but integration depth varies. Gong, Claap, Avoma, and Chorus offer native bi-directional sync that automatically updates CRM fields based on call content. tl;dv, Fathom, and Fireflies typically offer one-way sync or require higher-tier plans for full CRM enrichment. Check each vendor's integration documentation to ensure they support your specific CRM fields and workflows—not all "integrations" are created equal.
Can I switch from Modjo without losing my historical call data?
Most platforms don't offer direct migration tools from Modjo, so you'll need to plan for this transition. Your best bet is to export key calls and insights from Modjo before switching, then focus on capturing new conversations in your new platform. Claap, Gong, and Avoma all offer robust search and organization features that make it easy to build a new library of searchable calls. The transition period typically takes 2-4 weeks for teams to fully adopt a new platform.
Ready to explore a modern alternative to Modjo? Try Claap free for your first 10 videos, or contact our Sales Team to unlock advanced features and see how conversation intelligence should work in 2025.
